| Population |
|
|
|
|
| Population, 1980 |
14,208 |
17,252 |
2,797 |
31,566 |
| Population, 1990 |
13,032 |
16,403 |
2,751 |
29,700 |
| Population, 2000 |
12,341 |
15,461 |
2,521 |
24,134 |
| Population, 2005-09 |
11,927 |
15,904 |
2,821 |
25,136 |
| Population, 2010 |
12,463 |
16,263 |
2,708 |
25,597 |
| % change population, 1980 to 1990 |
-8.3 |
-4.9 |
-26 |
22 |
| % change population, 1990 to 2000 |
-5.3 |
-5.7 |
-23 |
8.7 |
| % change population, 2000 to 2005-09 |
-3.4 |
2.9 |
-16 |
35 |
| % change population, 2000 to 2010 |
1.0 |
5.2 |
-16 |
36 |
| % children, 1980 |
22 |
22 |
1.7 |
42 |
| % children, 1990 |
20 |
19 |
1.4 |
36 |
| % children, 2000 |
23 |
20 |
1.2 |
41 |
| % children, 2005-09 |
22 |
19 |
1.6 |
37 |
| % children, 2010 |
21 |
17 |
1.4 |
33 |
| % change child population, 1980 to 1990 |
-16 |
-19 |
-40 |
48 |
| % change child population, 1990 to 2000 |
11 |
-2.0 |
-32 |
24 |
| % change child population, 2000 to 2005-09 |
-9.7 |
-0.3 |
-31 |
126 |
| % change child population, 2000 to 2010 |
-7.3 |
-12 |
-37 |
60 |
| % foreign born, 1980 |
4.4 |
6.4 |
1.0 |
19 |
| % foreign born, 1990 |
7.0 |
9.7 |
0.7 |
32 |
| % foreign born, 2000 |
16 |
13 |
0.7 |
38 |
| % foreign born, 2005-09 |
19 |
13 |
1.1 |
34 |
| % same house 5 years ago, 1990 |
67 |
53 |
30 |
74 |
| % same house 5 years ago, 2000 |
62 |
50 |
22 |
67 |
| Population by Race/Ethnicity |
|
|
|
|
| % black non-Hispanic, 1990 |
95 |
65 |
3.7 |
99 |
| % black non-Hispanic, 2000 |
87 |
61 |
3.2 |
99 |
| % black non-Hispanic, 2005-09 |
71 |
55 |
1.1 |
98 |
| % black non-Hispanic, 2010 |
67 |
51 |
3.9 |
98 |
| % white non-Hispanic, 1990 |
2.0 |
27 |
0.4 |
87 |
| % white non-Hispanic, 2000 |
1.1 |
28 |
0.4 |
86 |
| % white non-Hispanic, 2005-09 |
5.7 |
32 |
0.6 |
85 |
| % white non-Hispanic, 2010 |
6.3 |
35 |
0.6 |
80 |
| % Hispanic, 1990 |
2.5 |
5.2 |
0.3 |
26 |
| % Hispanic, 2000 |
11 |
7.9 |
0.3 |
34 |
| % Hispanic, 2005-09 |
22 |
8.5 |
0.5 |
37 |
| % Hispanic, 2010 |
25 |
9.1 |
1.1 |
32 |
| % Asian/P.I. non-Hispanic, 1990 |
0.3 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
7.4 |
| % Asian/P.I. non-Hispanic, 2000 |
0.4 |
3.0 |
0.1 |
13 |
| % Asian/P.I. non-Hispanic, 2005-09 |
0.5 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
11 |
| % Asian/P.I. non-Hispanic, 2010 |
1.4 |
4.2 |
0.2 |
13 |
| Family Risk Factors |
|
|
|
|
| Poverty rate (%), 1980 |
11 |
19 |
5.6 |
34 |
| Poverty rate (%), 1990 |
11 |
17 |
3.9 |
34 |
| Poverty rate (%), 2000 |
15 |
20 |
3.6 |
43 |
| Poverty rate (%), 2005-09 |
12 |
18 |
4.1 |
38 |
| Unemployment rate (%), 1980 |
7.6 |
6.8 |
1.7 |
15 |
| Unemployment rate (%), 1990 |
7.9 |
7.2 |
1.8 |
17 |
| Unemployment rate (%), 2000 |
8.3 |
11 |
1.2 |
32 |
| Unemployment rate (%), 2005-09 |
11 |
9.2 |
1.5 |
25 |
| % pop. 16+ yrs. employed, 1980 |
59 |
59 |
47 |
73 |
| % pop. 16+ yrs. employed, 1990 |
59 |
62 |
49 |
81 |
| % pop. 16+ yrs. employed, 2000 |
53 |
57 |
38 |
81 |
| % pop. 16+ yrs. employed, 2005-09 |
58 |
60 |
41 |
85 |
| % persons without HS diploma, 1980 |
41 |
33 |
6.0 |
55 |
| % persons without HS diploma, 1990 |
31 |
27 |
4.4 |
48 |
| % persons without HS diploma, 2000 |
28 |
22 |
2.0 |
49 |
| % persons without HS diploma, 2005-09 |
27 |
15 |
0.0 |
32 |
| % female-headed families with children, 1990 |
61 |
54 |
3.2 |
78 |
| % female-headed families with children, 2000 |
53 |
52 |
3.6 |
76 |
| % female-headed families with children, 2005-09 |
54 |
53 |
4.9 |
85 |
| Isolation Indicators |
|
|
|
|
| % HHs with a phone, 2000 |
98 |
97 |
92 |
100 |
| % HHs with a phone, 2005-09 |
98 |
95 |
91 |
98 |
| % HHs with a car, 2000 |
67 |
63 |
43 |
91 |
| % HHs with a car, 2005-09 |
74 |
64 |
43 |
91 |
| Child Well-Being Indicators |
|
|
|
|
| % children in poverty, 1990 |
15 |
25 |
0.0 |
50 |
| % children in poverty, 2000 |
21 |
32 |
0.9 |
55 |
| % children in poverty, 2005-09 |
15 |
29 |
0.0 |
56 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 1998 |
14 |
13 |
0.0 |
20 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 1999 |
14 |
13 |
3.8 |
19 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 2000 |
6.8 |
12 |
0.0 |
21 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 2001 |
13 |
12 |
2.6 |
19 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 2002 |
12 |
12 |
2.6 |
17 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 2003 |
11 |
11 |
2.4 |
17 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 2004 |
8.7 |
11 |
2.9 |
18 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 2005 |
9.9 |
11 |
4.4 |
17 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 2006 |
10 |
11 |
2.8 |
18 |
| % low weight births (under 5.5 lbs), 2007 |
12 |
11 |
3.2 |
16 |
| % births to teen mothers, 1998 |
15 |
15 |
0.0 |
27 |
| % births to teen mothers, 1999 |
14 |
15 |
0.0 |
25 |
| % births to teen mothers, 2000 |
13 |
14 |
0.0 |
25 |
| % births to teen mothers, 2001 |
15 |
13 |
0.0 |
25 |
| % births to teen mothers, 2002 |
15 |
13 |
0.0 |
22 |
| % births to teen mothers, 2003 |
17 |
11 |
0.0 |
22 |
| % births to teen mothers, 2004 |
14 |
11 |
0.0 |
20 |
| % births to teen mothers, 2005 |
14 |
11 |
0.0 |
21 |
| % births to teen mothers, 2006 |
17 |
12 |
0.0 |
25 |
| % births to teen mothers, 2007 |
15 |
12 |
0.0 |
25 |
| Income Conditions |
|
|
|
|
| Avg. family income (2010 $), 1979 |
72,117 |
77,355 |
42,170 |
254,017 |
| Avg. family income (2010 $), 1989 |
72,137 |
93,288 |
42,603 |
275,056 |
| Avg. family income (2010 $), 1999 |
71,414 |
102,342 |
38,735 |
312,741 |
| Avg. family income (2010 $), 2005-09 |
65,635 |
115,016 |
39,639 |
314,827 |
| % change in avg. family income, 1980 to 1990 |
0.0 |
21 |
-2.0 |
52 |
| % change in avg. family income, 1990 to 2000 |
-1.0 |
9.7 |
-24 |
44 |
| % change in avg. family income, 2000 to 2005-09 |
-8.1 |
12 |
-23 |
68 |
| Public Assistance |
|
|
|
|
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2000 |
1,609 |
2,176 |
13 |
6,166 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2001 |
1,500 |
2,063 |
16 |
5,565 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2002 |
1,472 |
2,112 |
5.0 |
5,430 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2003 |
1,581 |
2,294 |
6.0 |
6,326 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2004 |
1,699 |
2,433 |
16 |
7,359 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2005 |
1,824 |
2,488 |
22 |
7,635 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2006 |
1,893 |
2,454 |
16 |
7,275 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2007 |
1,886 |
2,416 |
15 |
7,068 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2008 |
2,050 |
2,516 |
7.0 |
7,708 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2009 |
2,590 |
2,909 |
9.0 |
8,759 |
| Persons receiving food stamps, 2010 |
3,183 |
3,304 |
13 |
9,460 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 1998 |
1,141 |
1,592 |
0.0 |
5,564 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 1999 |
985 |
1,385 |
0.0 |
4,735 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2000 |
877 |
1,259 |
0.0 |
4,237 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2001 |
882 |
1,252 |
6.0 |
3,950 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2002 |
909 |
1,272 |
0.0 |
3,887 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2003 |
874 |
1,279 |
0.0 |
3,939 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2004 |
903 |
1,323 |
0.0 |
4,117 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2005 |
906 |
1,299 |
6.0 |
4,042 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2006 |
917 |
1,205 |
0.0 |
3,775 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2007 |
838 |
1,145 |
0.0 |
3,546 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2008 |
882 |
1,143 |
0.0 |
3,775 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2009 |
992 |
1,220 |
0.0 |
4,165 |
| Persons receiving TANF, 2010 |
1,095 |
1,256 |
5.0 |
4,200 |
| Housing Conditions |
|
|
|
|
| Occupied housing units, 1980 |
5,154 |
6,842 |
1,572 |
11,655 |
| Occupied housing units, 1990 |
4,940 |
6,747 |
1,546 |
11,016 |
| Occupied housing units, 2000 |
4,717 |
6,712 |
1,581 |
12,116 |
| Occupied housing units, 2005-09 |
4,379 |
6,776 |
1,532 |
10,841 |
| Occupied housing units, 2010 |
4,708 |
7,208 |
1,494 |
11,979 |
| Rental vacancy rate (%), 1980 |
1.8 |
6.0 |
1.5 |
14 |
| Rental vacancy rate (%), 1990 |
5.5 |
8.0 |
3.4 |
16 |
| Rental vacancy rate (%), 2000 |
8.5 |
6.2 |
1.4 |
14 |
| Rental vacancy rate (%), 2005-09 |
5.6 |
5.9 |
0.5 |
12 |
| Homeownership rate (%), 1980 |
53 |
35 |
10.0 |
73 |
| Homeownership rate (%), 1990 |
56 |
39 |
13 |
70 |
| Homeownership rate (%), 2000 |
56 |
41 |
17 |
73 |
| Homeownership rate (%), 2005-09 |
58 |
45 |
18 |
75 |
| Housing Market (Single-Family Homes) |
|
|
|
|
| Number of sales, 1995 |
88 |
84 |
5.0 |
212 |
| Number of sales, 1996 |
104 |
93 |
6.0 |
233 |
| Number of sales, 1997 |
118 |
107 |
9.0 |
263 |
| Number of sales, 1998 |
153 |
144 |
16 |
345 |
| Number of sales, 1999 |
145 |
137 |
12 |
337 |
| Number of sales, 2000 |
124 |
113 |
10 |
286 |
| Number of sales, 2001 |
133 |
114 |
7.0 |
289 |
| Number of sales, 2002 |
122 |
114 |
9.0 |
303 |
| Number of sales, 2003 |
130 |
113 |
17 |
272 |
| Number of sales, 2004 |
185 |
128 |
12 |
294 |
| Number of sales, 2005 |
173 |
119 |
8.0 |
325 |
| Number of sales, 2006 |
143 |
97 |
5.0 |
216 |
| Number of sales, 2007 |
99 |
83 |
2.0 |
276 |
| Number of sales, 2008 |
51 |
59 |
3.0 |
174 |
| Number of sales, 2009 |
50 |
58 |
7.0 |
186 |
| Number of sales, 2010 |
60 |
66 |
5.0 |
189 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 1995 |
150,000 |
254,000 |
90,000 |
571,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 1996 |
146,000 |
238,000 |
90,000 |
537,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 1997 |
147,000 |
246,000 |
99,000 |
916,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 1998 |
144,000 |
260,000 |
100,000 |
1,027,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 1999 |
151,000 |
280,000 |
95,000 |
1,084,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2000 |
158,000 |
316,000 |
96,000 |
1,199,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2001 |
185,000 |
370,000 |
116,000 |
1,558,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2002 |
206,000 |
423,000 |
130,000 |
945,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2003 |
271,000 |
455,000 |
130,000 |
1,481,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2004 |
323,000 |
530,000 |
162,000 |
2,037,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2005 |
419,000 |
613,000 |
221,000 |
2,183,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2006 |
433,000 |
634,000 |
261,000 |
1,244,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2007 |
421,000 |
658,000 |
268,000 |
1,209,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2008 |
380,000 |
607,000 |
228,000 |
1,241,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2009 |
346,000 |
563,000 |
209,000 |
1,596,000 |
| Median sales price (2010 $), 2010 |
366,000 |
589,000 |
185,000 |
1,218,000 |
| % annual change median price, 2000-2010 |
8.7 |
6.4 |
3.7 |
14 |
| % annual change median price, 2005-2010 |
-2.7 |
-0.8 |
-4.9 |
7.5 |
| % annual change median price, 2009-2010 |
5.8 |
4.6 |
-19 |
18 |
| Mortgage Lending (Home Purchase Loans) |
|
|
|
|
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 1997 |
23 |
39 |
9.3 |
91 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 1998 |
29 |
53 |
11 |
123 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 1999 |
31 |
59 |
15 |
143 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 2000 |
37 |
61 |
13 |
153 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 2001 |
42 |
63 |
13 |
142 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 2002 |
38 |
67 |
20 |
177 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 2003 |
48 |
71 |
14 |
187 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 2004 |
79 |
88 |
23 |
345 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 2005 |
87 |
102 |
41 |
317 |
| Loans per 1,000 housing units, 2006 |
88 |
94 |
40 |
359 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 1997 |
49,321 |
81,908 |
32,007 |
189,815 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 1998 |
57,942 |
82,009 |
35,700 |
180,000 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 1999 |
55,161 |
81,626 |
29,985 |
175,395 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 2000 |
65,394 |
90,089 |
27,166 |
190,401 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 2001 |
64,518 |
96,481 |
42,929 |
205,806 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 2002 |
72,461 |
97,861 |
39,456 |
191,220 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 2003 |
78,263 |
99,952 |
37,294 |
200,140 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 2004 |
81,652 |
110,309 |
57,687 |
200,030 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 2005 |
97,144 |
118,624 |
64,762 |
208,834 |
| Median borrower income (2006 $), 2006 |
105,724 |
126,738 |
68,531 |
253,109 |
| % subprime loans, 1997 |
18 |
3.9 |
0.0 |
27 |
| % subprime loans, 1998 |
22 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
58 |
| % subprime loans, 1999 |
18 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
41 |
| % subprime loans, 2000 |
8.4 |
5.1 |
1.1 |
34 |
| % subprime loans, 2001 |
7.5 |
3.1 |
0.6 |
15 |
| % subprime loans, 2002 |
5.8 |
2.8 |
0.0 |
12 |
| % subprime loans, 2003 |
7.6 |
3.6 |
0.0 |
13 |
| % subprime loans, 2004 |
12 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
18 |
| % subprime loans, 2005 |
21 |
10 |
0.0 |
30 |
| % subprime loans, 2006 |
18 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
26 |
| Reported Crimes (per 1,000 pop.) |
|
|
|
|
| Violent crimes, 2000 |
12 |
15 |
0.9 |
37 |
| Violent crimes, 2001 |
11 |
15 |
1.2 |
43 |
| Violent crimes, 2002 |
12 |
15 |
0.9 |
29 |
| Violent crimes, 2003 |
16 |
16 |
0.5 |
33 |
| Violent crimes, 2004 |
13 |
14 |
0.5 |
27 |
| Violent crimes, 2005 |
13 |
14 |
0.5 |
31 |
| Violent crimes, 2006 |
12 |
13 |
0.8 |
28 |
| Violent crimes, 2007 |
16 |
14 |
0.6 |
28 |
| Violent crimes, 2008 |
14 |
13 |
0.4 |
25 |
| Violent crimes, 2009 |
15 |
13 |
0.5 |
27 |
| Violent crimes, 2010 |
15 |
12 |
0.5 |
27 |
| Property crimes, 2000 |
37 |
54 |
12 |
164 |
| Property crimes, 2001 |
34 |
56 |
16 |
160 |
| Property crimes, 2002 |
40 |
54 |
12 |
130 |
| Property crimes, 2003 |
32 |
54 |
14 |
121 |
| Property crimes, 2004 |
29 |
47 |
11 |
109 |
| Property crimes, 2005 |
30 |
43 |
11 |
96 |
| Property crimes, 2006 |
26 |
42 |
10 |
105 |
| Property crimes, 2007 |
28 |
45 |
10 |
101 |
| Property crimes, 2008 |
26 |
46 |
12 |
101 |
| Property crimes, 2009 |
26 |
44 |
12 |
100 |
| Property crimes, 2010 |
28 |
40 |
12 |
85 |